FY2026-2035 · CBO February 2026 baseline

Biden 2025 Proposal

2.6pp on income above $400K, restoring the pre-TCJA 39.6% top rate. Treasury FY2025 Green Book estimate: raises ~$252B over 10 years.

Ten-year deficit effect, conventional-$302.2Breduces the deficit
With macroeconomic feedback and debt service-$338.9BFRB/US-Lite (Federal Reserve calibrated)
Checked against

Published score -$245.9B; this estimate is 21.9% away (out-of-sample prediction). Out-of-sample prediction, 21.9% from -$246B (U.S. Treasury) — pre-registered before it was scored.

Typical error for this kind of policy: -$348.5B to -$256.0B, from 11 out-of-sample ordinary rate change cases.

Out-of-sample accuracy, ordinary rate change: 11 pre-registered rows miss their published scores by 15.3% on average (median 15.0%), worst 40.6% — 6 of the 11 fall inside the average. On this figure that is -$348.5B to -$256.0B typical, -$424.9B to -$179.5B at the worst row. Read off the out-of-sample tier only — not the calibrated tiers, whose agreement is by construction. It is the observed spread of this model against published scores for this class of policy, not a confidence interval.

Year by year

billions, conventional
Fiscal yearRevenueDeficit, conventionalMacro feedbackDebt serviceDeficit, dynamic
2026+$28.8B-$25.2B-$4.4B-$1.0B-$21.8B
2027+$30.1B-$26.3B-$5.2B-$2.1B-$23.2B
2028+$31.3B-$27.4B-$4.6B-$3.2B-$26.0B
2029+$32.5B-$28.4B-$3.6B-$4.3B-$29.1B
2030+$33.8B-$29.5B-$2.7B-$5.5B-$32.3B
2031+$35.0B-$30.7B-$2.0B-$6.7B-$35.4B
2032+$36.4B-$31.8B-$1.4B-$8.0B-$38.4B
2033+$37.7B-$33.0B-$1.0B-$9.3B-$41.3B
2034+$39.2B-$34.3B-$0.7B-$10.7B-$44.3B
2035+$40.6B-$35.6B-$0.5B-$12.1B-$47.2B

Download CSV

Who pays

first year, by income group
Total tax change, 2026+$31.4Bpeople pay more
Returns paying more1.7%
Returns paying less0.0%
Income groupReturnsAverage changeShare of incomeShare of totalPaying morePaying lessTax rate beforeTax rate after
Lowest Quintile56.4M$00.00%0.0%0.0%0.0%-3.5%-3.5%
Second Quintile37.8M$00.00%0.0%0.0%0.0%3.5%3.5%
Middle Quintile28.4M$00.00%0.0%0.0%0.0%7.4%7.4%
Fourth Quintile19.5M$00.00%0.0%0.0%0.0%9.9%9.9%
Top Quintile18.3M+$1,7090.51%100.0%15.0%0.0%20.3%20.7%

Return-level microsimulation on CPS ASEC tax units calibrated to IRS data: the validated distributional tier. Groups are ranked by adjusted gross income per return. Average change is in dollars per return; positive means the group pays more tax.

Economic effects

difference from the CBO baseline
GDP, summed over the window-0.37percent-years
Jobs at the largest effect-47K
Deficit effect of the GDP change+$26.0Bless tax collected
Deficit effect of interest on the debt-$62.7Bless debt, less interest
Fiscal yearGDP levelJobsUnemployment10-year rateGDP change, deficitInterest, deficit
2026-0.063%-40K+0.03 pt-0.00 pt+$4.4B-$1.0B
2027-0.074%-47K+0.04 pt-0.01 pt+$5.2B-$2.1B
2028-0.066%-42K+0.03 pt-0.01 pt+$4.6B-$3.2B
2029-0.052%-33K+0.03 pt-0.01 pt+$3.6B-$4.3B
2030-0.039%-25K+0.02 pt-0.01 pt+$2.7B-$5.5B
2031-0.028%-18K+0.01 pt-0.02 pt+$2.0B-$6.7B
2032-0.020%-13K+0.01 pt-0.02 pt+$1.4B-$8.0B
2033-0.014%-9K+0.01 pt-0.02 pt+$1.0B-$9.3B
2034-0.010%-6K+0.00 pt-0.03 pt+$0.7B-$10.7B
2035-0.007%-4K+0.00 pt-0.03 pt+$0.5B-$12.1B

FRB/US-Lite (Federal Reserve calibrated). Demand effects fade over five to seven years as monetary policy responds; there is no supply-side channel. The dynamic score is the conventional score, plus the deficit effects of the GDP change and of interest on the debt: -$302.2B + $26.0B - $62.7B = -$338.9B.

Other scoring models

exploratory
ModelTen-year deficit effectMethod
CBO-Style-$302.2BStatic + ETI behavioral response + optional FRB/US dynamic feedback
TPC-Microsim Pilot-$355.6BSingle-year CPS-style microsimulation with flat-horizon annualization and quintile distribution output. Default microdata is already SOI-calibrated (top tail included); no separate top-tail augmentation applied. Maps to microsim reforms: income_rate_change, income_rate_change_threshold. Income-tax rate changes are applied to ordinary taxable income above the policy threshold ($400,000) in the pilot microsim.

CBO-Style is the model behind the headline above. The TPC-style microsimulation is a pilot: where the two disagree, the gap tells you how much the answer depends on method. It is not an official range.

Limitations

Cite asWilse-Samson, Laurence. “Biden 2025 Proposal.” Fiscal Policy Calculator, CBO February 2026 baseline, FY2026-2035. https://fiscal.lwilsesamson.com/explore/top-rate-39-6