Progressive vs. Flat Tax: Trade-offs in Tax Design
Compare a progressive income tax structure with a flat tax proposal. Analyze the revenue, distributional, and efficiency implications of each system, and evaluate common arguments for and against tax simplification.
What you will learn
Define progressivity using effective vs. marginal tax rates
Calculate revenue-neutral flat tax rate
Quantify the distributional trade-offs of moving to a flat tax
0 of 2 exercises complete at the undergraduate level. Saved in this browser.
1. What Does the Current System Look Like?
Explore
The US federal income tax has seven brackets from 10% to 37%. The effective (average) tax rate rises with income but is always below the marginal rate due to bracket structure.
Using the model, estimate the 10-year revenue effect of: (a) Raising the top rate from 37% to 39.6% (+2.6pp) on income above $400K (b) Cutting the bottom rate from 10% to 8% (−2pp) on income below $50K
Compare the two effects. Which has a larger revenue impact? Why?
2. Designing a Revenue-Neutral Flat Tax
Find the target
A flat tax applies a single rate to all taxable income above a personal exemption. To be revenue-neutral, it must raise the same amount as the current system (~$2.2 trillion/year in individual income taxes).
Given a $15,000 personal exemption, there are roughly 130 million taxable filers with average taxable income of ~$55,000.
Total taxable base (above exemption) ≈ 130M × ($55,000 − $15,000) = $5.2T
At what flat rate does revenue = $2.2T? Answer: $2.2T / $5.2T = ____%
Enter the required flat rate as a percentage (e.g., enter 22.5 for 22.5%).
Submission
Undergraduate · 0 of 2 complete
Name not given · Progressive vs. Flat Tax: Trade-offs in Tax Design
1. What Does the Current System Look Like? Not attempted
2. Designing a Revenue-Neutral Flat Tax Not attempted
Answers are checked against the Fiscal Policy Calculator at the settings shown.